OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsbpel-spec-edit message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Re: Applied Issue 92



Hi DK,

Yes, I also have a similar interpretation (i.e. attributes at 
"tExtension" are required) even though we don't have explicit text in 
the proposal that state so. Therefore, I adjust the corresponding part 
of schema listed in 92.4 proposal.

Thank you for confirming my interpretation.


Regards,
Alex Yiu


Dieter Koenig1 wrote:

>As far as I can tell, only 92 (
>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200504/msg00109.html) and 92.1
>(close without change) are relevant here. There is a text "Optional
>extension MAY be declared using the extensions element with
>mustUnderstand="no" but there is no requirement to do so" in 92.4, but that
>allows the declaration of optional extensions to be absent. If the
>declaration is present then the attributes must both be provided, i.e. the
>attributes in the tExtension snippet must have use="required".
>Kind Regards
>DK
>
>
>
>                                                                           
>             Alex Yiu                                                      
>             <alex.yiu@oracle.                                             
>             com>                                                       To 
>                                       bpel spec                           
>             17.10.2005 20:48          <wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open. 
>                                       org>, Prasad Yendluri               
>                                       <pyendluri@webmethods.com>          
>                                                                        cc 
>                                       Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com>,     
>                                       Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com>,      
>                                       Dieter Koenig1/Germany/IBM@IBMDE,   
>                                       "Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> 
>                                                                   Subject 
>                                       Applied Issue 92                    
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi, all,
>
>I have made changes for Issue 92 (both in XSD and spec word doc).
>
>Few notes worth mentioning:
>      I added one more entry in Appendix F Revision History, since the
>      entry for the last edit was missing.
>      There are discrepancies between the spec text and the XSD.
>      The spec text (proposed by Dieter and Yaron) implies "namespace" and
>      "mustUnderstand" attributes are required (because the syntax template
>      does not have "?" assiocated with them and there are not default
>      value defined). On the other hand, the XSD (proposed by Yaron) are
>      saying those 2 attributes optional. After some careful consideration
>      of the spec text, I would guess XSD are the ones which contain
>      mistake. (I am cc'ing this email to Dieter and Yaron). (I may later
>      forward this note to the main TC mailing list.)
>
>***  Prasad, the pen is for you to grab now.
>
>
>Thanks!
>
>
>Regards,
>Alex Yiu
>
>
>
>  
>




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]