[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] implicite links of the runtime engine (was: Implicit<sequence> macro)
> TenHove: An alternative may be to try to automate the conversion to > a structured process. This has some interesting implications. BPEL is > not to be considered a modeling language. What language should we use > for modeling? What about on-line debugging and monitoring? > > As with other issues that have arisen on this list, many of the > answers will be clearer when we have a clear set of requirements to > fulfill. If I understand what you are saying, you regard BPEL (like > WSFL before it) to be a largely a description of an executable > process, rather than a user-level model of business processes. Is this > correct? > mm1: Frank, as you indicated you have customer experience, it would be relevant for you to submit a use case that supports your premises. Then, the TC can make their conclusions. Thanks.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]