[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Agenda for 07-23-2003 WSBPEL Conference Call
Great ideas. I will make sure we take this approach. I think the issue discussion portion of the agenda is the most important part of the call - I want to ensure this time is used as efficiently as possible. Thanks for the recommendations! JohnE > -----Original Message----- > From: Liu, Kevin [mailto:kevin.liu@sap.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 5:52 PM > To: John Evdemon; 'wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org' > Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Agenda for 07-23-2003 WSBPEL Conference Call > > Hi John, > > Glad to see that issue discussion finally makes its way to our agenda :). > > To make sure the call time is productively used for issue discussion, I > would suggest we add an agenda item for tomorrow to go through the current > list of issues, and recruit champion(s) for each issue. As defined in the > issue process document section 3.3, see[1] > > "The job of the champion(s) is to drive an issue to resolution. The exact > means of doing so typically involve e-mail threads and direct discussion > with interested parties but the details are left to the champion(s)." > > May I volunteer to be the champion for issue 2 and issue 4 and suggest > that we postpone the discussion of issue 4 to next call? I am not sure if > we can make good progress for both in one call. I would like to see some > traffic in the mail list first to have as many as possible questions > clarified, and I need some time to come up with a straw man proposal for > the group's discussion. > > In addition, we may also discuss how long in advance the list of issues to > be discussed in a conference calls or f2f should be made available to the > group. IMHO, for the champions and the group to be well prepared for a > particular issue so productive discussions can be expected, the list of > issues to be discussed should be made available to the group at least 5 > days in advance given our call is every two weeks. > > Best Regards, > Kevin > > [1] http://www.oasis- > open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/download.php/2628/issuesprocess.htm > > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Evdemon [mailto:jevdemon@microsoft.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:53 AM > To: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [wsbpel] Agenda for 07-23-2003 WSBPEL Conference Call > > We have a WS BPEL TC conference call scheduled for Wednesday, July 23, > from > 08:00-11:00 Pacific time aka > 11:00-02:00 Eastern time aka > 15:00-18:00 UTC > 16:00-19:00 in Ireland and the UK > 17:00-20:00 in middle (most of) Europe > > While we have allocated three hours for the call, I hope that we will be > able to wrap up in 2 hours or less. > > USA Toll Free Number: 888-711-4576 > USA Toll Number: +1-484-630-9377 > LEADER: MS DIANE JORDAN > PASSCODE: WS BPEL TECHNICAL COMMITTEE > The passcode and the leader's name will be required to join the call. > > If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the TC list > before the start of the conference call. > > -------- > > Agenda: > > 1) Accept minutes from the last conference call > > 2) Nomination/volunteer to take minutes for this call > > 3) Administrivia > - Past minutes are unavailable on the WSBPEL web site. > - Email/document access problems? > - Other issues? > > 4) Requirements and Issues Coordination subgroup report > > There are 25 issues documented at: > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-reqts/download.php/2 > 638/bpel_issues1.html. Priorities for reviewing and resolving these > issues will be discussed by one or more members of the Requirements and > Issues Coordination subgroup. A short report on plans vs. progress will > be presented by a member of the subgroup. A member of the subgroup > shall select and discuss no more than four issues that have been > identified. > > TC Members are encouraged to review the issues at > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-reqts/download.php/2 > 638/bpel_issues1.html and be prepared to discuss them on the call. > > The purpose of the discussion is to brief the TC on the selected issues > in preparation for a vote on one or more proposed solutions (the vote > will be delayed until our next call if no solutions are available for > presentation to the TC). > > If no one volunteers to identify issues for discussion, the following > issues will be used: > > Issue 1: Permeability of Scopes > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-reqts/download.php/2 > 638/bpel_issues1.html#Issue1 > > Issue 2: Sub-Functions > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-reqts/download.php/2 > 638/bpel_issues1.html#Issue2 > > Issue 3: Current state influence in compensation handlers > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-reqts/download.php/2 > 638/bpel_issues1.html#Issue3 > > Issue 4: Dynamic parallel processing > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-reqts/download.php/2 > 638/bpel_issues1.html#Issue4 > > 5) Use Cases subgroup report > > - Report on 07-21-2003 conference call > - Review of Use Cases under consideration (see > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-uc/download.php/2960 > /usecases.html) > - Next steps > > 6) Liaisons subgroup report > - Rajesh Pradhan or an alternate member of the subgroup will report on > the status of Current and Requested Liaisons: > > - W3C Web Services Choreography WG (Greg Ritzinger) > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-liaisons/download.ph > p/2644/WSBPEL%20Liaison%20Activities%20Nominations%20Ws%20Choreography.d > oc > > - BCM (David Webber) > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-liaisons/download.ph > p/2641/WSBPEL_LiaisonActivitiesNominationsForm-BCM.doc > > - BPSS (Monica Martin) > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-liaisons/download.ph > p/2869/WSBPEL_LiaisonActivitiesNominationsForm-BPSS_071303.doc > > - CEFACT BPWG (John Evdemon) > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-liaisons/download.ph > p/2970/WSBPEL_LiaisonActivitiesNominationsForm-UNCEFACT_071503.doc > > 7) Specification Editing subgroup report > - Nothing to report at this time - it is assumed that this group will be > somewhat inactive until the Requirements and Issues Coordination > subgroup reviews and the TC approves possible enhancements to the spec. > > - A member of the Specification Editing may want to explain their > process for maintaining the specification. > > 8) New Implementation subgroup > - Based on TC discussions, it appears that a new Implementation should > be established > - The Implementation subgroup focuses on BPEL representation within a > graphical (or non-graphical) environment > - The Implementation subgroup offers vendors an opportunity to > demonstrate their products > - Since presentation of WSBPEL is out of scope, most (if not all) of the > work performed by this group shall be non-normative. > - Persons interested in leading an Implementation subgroup should > describe their qualifications, plans and interests in leading the > subgroup. > > 9) Additional items/new business > > -------- > > Please contact me if you have any questions or have any > additions/modifications to the agenda. > > JohnE > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: wsbpel-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: wsbpel-help@lists.oasis-open.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: wsbpel-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: wsbpel-help@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]