Re: [wsbpel] Issue 49 - Disambiguating <receive>s to <reply> to

[Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com>]

ah, i see.  is the only reason for this that otherwise it would open up
issue 49?  i can see lots of uses for this, especially with the event
handlers (how do you guard against multiple concurrent status requests?),
but also business uses.

thanks
danny

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dieter Roller" <rol@de.ibm.com>
To: <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 12:50 AM
Subject: [wsbpel] Issue 49 - Disambiguating <receive>s to <reply> to


> Danny,
>
> this would result in a conflictingRequest exception unless the correlation
> sets differ ...
>
> Cheers,
>
> dieter
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: wsbpel-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: wsbpel-help@lists.oasis-open.org
>
>