[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
At the conference call this morning, I presented
issue 11 as it has progressed so far. The current state is that there are
2 proposals on the table, both of which are equivalent in terms of what they
accomplish, but we don't need both of them. The desire is that we get some
feedback from the TC as to which avenue to pursue, so that we can flush out one
of them, and present it to the TC for a vote. Links to the issues are
below. If you have any opinon at all, please respond to this mail with AT
LEAST +A/-A +B/-B so we can gauge reactions to the proposals. If you want
to share reasons for your opinion, that is welcome, too. Note that you
should take these proposals as partially-baked. We plan to refine the
"winning" proposal into one that is spec-worthy.
On the call and in email since the summaries were
posted, there has been some discussion. I have linked the email point
here, and I hope that those who expressed support for either option (I believe
it was just Yaron, but I could be wrong) will repeat them in email for
posterity. Unfortunately, Chris Keller was not on the call at the time of
discussion, and I was unable to present his proposal with the clarity that he
would have, so the discussion may have been skewed in favor of my
proposal. If that occurred, it was certainly not my intention to bias the
discussion.
The hope is that we will get a sense of direction by the next conference
call, and failing that, at the September face to face. Putting the issue
to a Kavi ballot for a sense of direction was also raised (by Monica Martin?),
since that would force those who cared to state their opinion.
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]