[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] [Fwd: [wsbpel-reqts] [bpel-rqmts[ Jordan 8/29/2003: Issues Categories for Discussion Boundaries]
Issue 52 is definitely not about correlation :-) -----Original Message----- From: Monica Martin [mailto:monica.martin@sun.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 8:42 AM To: ws bpel tc Subject: [wsbpel] [Fwd: [wsbpel-reqts] [bpel-rqmts[ Jordan 8/29/2003: Issues Categories for Discussion Boundaries] Per Diane's request to post suggestions. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [wsbpel-reqts] [bpel-rqmts[ Jordan 8/29/2003: Issues Categories for Discussion Boundaries Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:54:30 -0600 From: Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com> To: bpel rqmts <wsbpel-reqts@lists.oasis-open.org>, Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> Diane, In Wednesday's call we discussed trying to put the issues in similar functional buckets for discussion, not particularly categorization by priority. I think several of the priorities by function are apparent, but (as we discussed) this is for the TC to decide. Here is a broad categorization to discuss issues. They fall pretty nicely except we may need to decompose correlation further, and also discuss it understanding clear definitions for conversation, transaction and business transaction. I anticipate these will be discussed and the recognition made during the face-to-face in September. I would like to propose these be considered by the TC to bound [re: provide a focus for] discussions. Whether or not the proposals or the volunteers champions are combined, that's will be up to this SC and the TC itself. I am formally asking we bring this up on Wednesday and consider discussing the issues in this fashion in the F2F. Thank you.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]