[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down
Chris Keller wrote: >+1 >-----Original Message----- >From: Monica Martin [mailto:monica.martin@sun.com] >Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 9:54 AM >To: chris.keller@active-endpoints.com >Cc: 'Danny van der Rijn'; wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down > >Chris Keller wrote: > > > >>Danny, >> >>The way the current copy/to functionality reads is as a content >>replacement not a node copy. Although it is not clear the treatment of >>attributes and child nodes for query (since there are no examples), but >>based on the requirement that the types be compatible it would appear >> >> >to > > >>be a complete content copy (attributes and child nodes). >> >> >> >mm1: As we have seen with issue 52, perhaps we need a few examples or >even use cases to solidify what the requirements are here - content >replacement >or node copy. > > mm2: Chris, we have a template so if you and Danny can solidify your thoughts, I would be willing to assist as needed to get the use case formalized. (Within my limit of understanding of some of the syntactic nuances you both have been discussing). Let's think of a relevant scenario first. Thanks.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]