RE: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliability?

["Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>]

The concept of Property provides a way of focusing attention on some message parts instead of others. But I am not sure that would correspond to "excluding" those message parts not referenced by any Property.

 

Ugo

-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Ten-Hove [mailto:Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 12:04 PM
To: Ugo Corda
Cc: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliability?

Ugo Corda wrote:

But what if message parts defined for reliable messaging purposes appear in the abstract WSDL? I think this kind of WSDL work has not been finalized in the two RM groups, but it's not inconceivable that the abstract WSDL could be extended with rm info.

A interesting point; should we find a way exclude such WS-{R,RM} protocol-related message parts from being used in the business process? Or, more generally, non-business related payload message parts?

-Ron