[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliability?
Ron, Definately - no need to re-invent the wheel here. Do we need to propose something (I like your idea of a non-normative implementors note in the addendum of the spec's) - or will the F2F cover this off? Thanks, DW. ============================================== Message text written by Ron Ten-Hove > David, I like it. Those loosely-coupled specs in the ebXML suite certainly enhance reusability -- something we should keep in mind in our efforts here. BPSS includes some simple mechanisms to specify QoS, in a fashion similar to what I sketched below. Perhaps we can do a little borrowing, point at CPP/A in a non-normative way, and we can declare victory. :-) Cheers, -Ron <
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]