Re: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliability?

[David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>]

Ron,

Definately - no need to re-invent the wheel here.  Do we need
to propose something (I like your idea of a non-normative
implementors note in the addendum of the spec's) - or 
will the F2F cover this off?

Thanks, DW.
==============================================
Message text written by Ron Ten-Hove
> 
David,

    I like it. Those loosely-coupled specs in the ebXML suite certainly 
enhance reusability -- something we should keep in mind in our efforts
here.

    BPSS includes some simple mechanisms to specify QoS, in a fashion 
similar to what I sketched below. Perhaps we can do a little borrowing, 
point at CPP/A in a non-normative way, and we can declare victory. :-)

Cheers,
-Ron
<