The latest work on
the WS-I Basic Profile 1.1 addresses exactly that.
Ugo
The
more interesting question from my Point of View is, how to actually include
the Attachements, which are normally used to transport the payload on
messaging like WSRM or ebXML MS.
I
think there are some drafts for extending WSDL for that, but no common way to
specify the schema for a secondary part.
Ugo Corda wrote:
But what if
message parts defined for reliable messaging purposes appear in the
abstract WSDL? I think this kind of WSDL work has not been finalized in
the two RM groups, but it's not inconceivable that the abstract WSDL could
be extended with rm info. A interesting
point; should we find a way exclude such WS-{R,RM} protocol-related message
parts from being used in the business process? Or, more generally,
non-business related payload message
parts?
-Ron
|