RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler

["Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com>]

Wonderful.  Since you are the champion, you get to propose the solution!

Cheers,
Satish

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Assaf Arkin [mailto:arkin@intalio.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 8:51 PM
To: Satish Thatte
Cc: Maciej Szefler; wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Multiple instances of event handler

Satish, I perfectly agree with you.

The "copy" as I understand it requires two variables to be defined. My 
proposal was for the event handler to declare a variable that is local 
to the event handler based on the message type and assign the input 
message to that variable. This does not require the variable to be 
defined in the same (or enclosing) scope as the event handler. From what

I can tell this requires no change to the syntax.

And since Satish offered the catch/faultVariable as an example, I think 
there's a general rule here that could apply in more than one case.

arkin

Satish Thatte wrote:

>Maciej,
>
>I seem to have misunderstood what we agreed at the recent F2F.  I
>thought everyone present agreed including Assaf that we need the
>*semantics* of the two syntactic variants I described below.  We didn't
>really discuss syntax in detail.
>
>Assaf, if you disagree please let us know.
>
>Satish
>  
>