Re: [wsbpel] Issue 99 - Proposal to vote

["Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com>]

Why don't we allow abstract activities to either start with a normal, 
legal start activity and/or an <opaque> activity? The meaning of using 
<opaque> as a start activity in the context of an abstract process is 
'unspecified stuff happens first..."

By explicitly including an <opaque> activity we make it clear that it 
was the intention of the author of the abstract activity to not specify 
how the process starts.

	Thanks,
		Yaron



Trickovic, Ivana wrote:

> Proposed resolution for issue 99: Any basic activity, except activities <reply> 
> and <terminate>, may appear at the beginning of a BPEL abstract process. 
> 
> The proposed resolution does not affect the BPEL Schema (no changes are needed). 
> Clarifications should be included in sections 6.4 and 11.4.
> 
> Please note that the <terminate> activity is limited to executable processes, 
> and a <reply> activity must always be preceded by a <receive> activity. 
> Therefore these two activities are explicitly excluded.
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Ivana
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the 
> OASIS TC), go to 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>