[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 114 - Proposal to Vote
>> Koening: Proposed resolution for issue 114: >> >> (1) Add text to the specification that clarifies the semantics in >> presence >> of multiple correlation sets: >> <clarification> >> If multiple correlation sets with initiate="no" are used in a receive, >> pick/onMessage, or eventHandler/onEvent, then they must all match a >> message for that message to be delivered to the activity in the given >> process instance. >> </clarification> >> >> (2) Ignore all references to EPRs in this issue and revisit that when >> 34 is >> resolved. >> > mm1: Dieter, on (1), the sentence is a bit unclear. Are you saying the > "they must all match a message <property values> must all match for > that message to be > delivered....? Perhaps you could clarify. Thanks. mm2: Cut and past error. Are you saying the "they must all match a message <property values> for that message to be delivered....?"
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]