Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 114 - Proposal to Vote

[Dieter Koenig1 <dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com>]

The point is that for multiple cs with initiate="no", each cs individually
must resolve to the same process instance. In other words, for each cs
individually, the corresponding property values from the received message
form a secondary key for the SAME process instance.
Kind Regards
DK



                                                                           
             "Monica J.                                                    
             Martin"                                                       
             <Monica.Martin@Su                                          To 
             n.COM>                    Dieter Koenig1/Germany/IBM@IBMDE    
                                                                        cc 
             17.06.2004 01:21          wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org         
                                                                   Subject 
                                       Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 114 - Proposal 
                                       to Vote                             
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           





>> Koening: Proposed resolution for issue 114:
>>
>> (1) Add text to the specification that clarifies the semantics in
>> presence
>> of multiple correlation sets:
>> <clarification>
>> If multiple correlation sets with initiate="no" are used in a receive,
>> pick/onMessage, or eventHandler/onEvent, then they must all match a
>> message for that message to be delivered to the activity in the given
>> process instance.
>> </clarification>
>>
>> (2) Ignore all references to EPRs in this issue and revisit that when
>> 34 is
>> resolved.
>>
> mm1: Dieter, on (1), the sentence is a bit unclear. Are you saying the
> "they must all match a message <property values> must all match for
> that message to be
> delivered....? Perhaps you could clarify. Thanks.

mm2: Cut and past error. Are you saying the "they must all match a
message <property values> for that message to be
delivered....?"


To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php
.