Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 146 - Draft of a proposal for vote

["Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com>]

Isn't the schema change for 146 just making the text in section 6.3 of 
the spec true? In other words, isn't the English already in the spec?

	Yaron

Francisco Curbera wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> 
> I agree on the substance. I assume we are going to have an English
> resolution in the appropriate place in the text which will be consistent
> with this schema snippet (and add what is missing there). I guess the
> editing team can take care of that. The only reason I say that is that up
> until now the specification text has driven the normative content of the
> specification, the schema being always subsidiary to the English wording.
> 
> Paco
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                                                                                                                                         
> 
> 
>                       "Yaron Y. 
> Goland"                                                                                                 
> 
> 
>                       <ygoland@bea.com>        To:       wsbpeltc 
> <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>                                        
> 
>                                                
> cc:                                                                                      
> 
> 
>                       07/30/2004 08:22         Subject:  [wsbpel] Issue 
> - 146 - Draft of a proposal for vote                           
> 
>                       
> PM                                                                                                                
> 
> 
>                       Please respond 
> to                                                                                                 
> 
> 
>                       
> ygoland                                                                                                           
> 
> 
>                                                                                                                                         
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I am thinking of putting the following up for a vote. What do y'all think?
> 
> I propose that the definition of tVariable be changed to:
> 
> <complexType name="tVariable">
>     <complexContent>
>        <extension base="bpws:tExtensibleElements">
>           <attribute name="name" type="NCName" use="required"/>
>           <attribute name="messageType" type="QName" use="optional"/>
>           <attribute name="type" type="QName" use="optional"/>
>           <attribute name="element" type="QName" use="optional"/>
>        </extension>
>     </complexContent>
> </complexType>
> 
> I checked this out with both XML Spy 2004 and the W3C XML Schema
> validator <http://www.w3.org/2001/03/webdata/xsv> and they both said it
> was fine.
> 
>              Thanks,
> 
>                          Yaron
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
> the OASIS TC), go to
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php 
> 
> .
> 
> 
>