Re: [wsbpel] "Using BPEL4WS in a Registry" .......

[Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>]

Farrukh Najmi wrote:

> (Resending after joining wsbpel TC as observer. Thanks for your 
> consideration.)
>
> John Evdemon wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure if anyone has time to work on such a document.  Besides, 
>> won't this just distract from the BPEL/UDDI paper? 
>> Who supports Reg/Rep?  
>>
> For a partial list of deployments for one specific implementation
> (freebXML Registry) please see:
>
>
> http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/aboutFAQ/About_freebXML_Registry.html#Deploymentspel 
>
> TC

Oops. above link should be:

    
http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/aboutFAQ/About_freebXML_Registry.html#Deployments

Sorry for the clutter.

-- 
Regards,
Farrukh


>
> For a partial of implementations:
>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=regrep
>
> Include to that list the following recent additions....
>
> -freebXML Registry
> http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net
>
> -Adobe
>
> -Infravio
>
> As an outside observer to the wsbpel, I wish to log an objection to any
> special consideration for UDDI over ebXML Registry in the wsbpel TC.
> Both UDDI and ebXML Registry are OASIS standards. Further, ebXML
> Registry is  also an ISO standard (ISO 15000 part 3 and 4).
>