RE: [wsbpel] "Using BPEL4WS in a Registry" .......

["Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>]

What I am saying is that there is a big difference, in terms of implied
resources, between just reviewing a Note developed by another group and
instead developing a Note ourselves. I would definitely be against the
latter.

Ugo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Monica J. Martin [mailto:Monica.Martin@Sun.COM] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 12:52 PM
> To: Ugo Corda
> Cc: Farrukh Najmi; John Evdemon; Eckenfels. Bernd; 
> wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [wsbpel] "Using BPEL4WS in a Registry" .......
> 
> 
> 
> >Corda: ....I would oppose any Reg/Rep-related activity that 
> went beyond 
> >the type of effort currently implied by the UDDI Note review. 
> >(Individuals can, of course, use their time whatever way 
> they want, as 
> >long as it does not impact this TC's schedule).
> >  
> >
> mm1: Ugo, I am somewhat confused. Was that implied? I don't think so. 
> Would it be safe to say you oppose any activity that would impact our 
> schedule (regardless of what technical note)? Thanks.
> 
>