OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsbpel message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [wsbpel] abstract process strawman]

yup, agreed :)

Monica J. Martin wrote:
>>> Khalaf: The def is not supposed to yield an algorithm directly, but 
>>> to clearly and intuitively explain what this compliance def is 
>>> checking for. The algorithm one may use to check "observable 
>>> compliance" should not a brute force one from the def, and that's 
>>> quite obvious to tell (you could have infinitely many 
>>> minimum-no-fault-...-completions). Also, the definition is still 
>>> being clarified.
> mm1: Please, use the word 'conformance.' Compliance is most often a 
> regulatory, mandatory requirement that has legal implications on 
> software performance. I believe in the context of this discussion 
> conformance, not compliance applies. They are very different things. 
> Thank you.

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]