OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsbpel message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 174 - Are multiple imports with the samenamespace allowed?


i thought that this issue was whether 2 separate things that are imported from different files can have the same namespace.  but i agree that when i read question 4, it's different.

Prasad Yendluri wrote:
It seems to me question 4 of issue 88 and this one are different though related issues.

Question 4 is speaking to a (particular) definition imported via two different files (directly, indirectly etc. I take).
Where as this issue has to do with, can one import the same (WSDL) file twice.

Regards, Prasad

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 174 - Are multiple imports with the same namespace allowed?
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:32:48 -0700
From: Yaron Y. Goland <ygoland@bea.com>
Reply-To: ygoland@bea.com
Organization: BEA
To: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
References: <200410231745.i9NHji86018479@ussjmg01.bea.com>

Isn't this issue addressed in question 4 of issue 88?

ws-bpel issues list editor wrote:
> This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list with a status of "received". 
> The status will be changed to "open" if the TC accepts it as identifying a bug 
> in the spec or decides it should be accepted specially. Otherwise it will be 
> closed without further consideration (but will be marked as "Revisitable")
> 
> The issues list is posted as a Technical Committee document to the OASIS WSBPEL 
> TC pages <http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel> on a regular 
> basis. The current edition, as a TC document, is the most recent version of the 
> document entitled ** in the "Issues" folder of the WSBPEL TC document list 
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/documents.php> - the next 
> posting as a TC document will include this issue. The list editor's working 
> copy, which will normally include an issue when it is announced, is available at 
> this constant URL <http://www.choreology.com/external/WS_BPEL_issues_list.html>.
> 
> 
>     Issue - 174 - Are multiple imports with the same namespace allowed?
> 
> *Status:* received
> *Date added:* 23 Oct 2004
> *Categories:* Related standards <#category_related_standards>
> *Date submitted:* 27 September 2004
> *Submitter:* Jim Clune <mailto:jim@parasoft.com>
> *Description:* Is it legal to have a BPEL process with two BPEL import elements 
> each pointing to WSDLs of the same namespace, but different locations? The 
> Document Linking section of the spec does not explicitly disallow this. One 
> might interpret this situation as legal, and one might further interpret 
> references to WSDL elements within such a process as resolving so long as each 
> element resolves to one of the imported WSDLs for that namespace.
> 
> The text should be clear.
> *Changes:* 23 Oct 2004 - new issue
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> To comment on this issue (including whether it should be accepted), please 
> follow-up to this announcement on the wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org list (replying 
> to this message should automatically send your message to that list), or ensure 
> the subject line as you send it *starts* "Issue - 174 - [anything]" or is a 
> reply to such a message. If you want to formally propose a resolution to an open 
> issue, please start the subject line "Issue - 174 - Proposed resolution", 
> without any Re: or similar.
> 
> To add a new issue, see the issues procedures document (but the address for new 
> issue submission is the sender of this announcement).
> 
> 
> Choreology Anti virus scan completed



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]