Danny van der Rijn wrote:
i thought
that this issue was whether 2 separate things that are
imported from different files can have the same namespace.
As I read it, it is speaking to the issue of importing two WSDL files
that have the same (target) namespace. Importing the same file more
than once for example falls in the same category.
but i
agree
that when i read question 4, it's different.
Prasad Yendluri wrote:
It seems to me question 4 of issue 88 and this one are different though
related issues.
Question 4 is speaking to a (particular) definition imported via two
different files (directly, indirectly etc. I take).
Where as this issue has to do with, can one import the same (WSDL) file
twice.
Regards, Prasad
-------- Original Message --------
Isn't this issue addressed in question 4 of issue 88?
ws-bpel issues list editor wrote:
> This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list with a status of "received".
> The status will be changed to "open" if the TC accepts it as identifying a bug
> in the spec or decides it should be accepted specially. Otherwise it will be
> closed without further consideration (but will be marked as "Revisitable")
>
> The issues list is posted as a Technical Committee document to the OASIS WSBPEL
> TC pages <http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel> on a regular
> basis. The current edition, as a TC document, is the most recent version of the
> document entitled ** in the "Issues" folder of the WSBPEL TC document list
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/documents.php> - the next
> posting as a TC document will include this issue. The list editor's working
> copy, which will normally include an issue when it is announced, is available at
> this constant URL <http://www.choreology.com/external/WS_BPEL_issues_list.html>.
>
>
> Issue - 174 - Are multiple imports with the same namespace allowed?
>
> *Status:* received
> *Date added:* 23 Oct 2004
> *Categories:* Related standards <#category_related_standards>
> *Date submitted:* 27 September 2004
> *Submitter:* Jim Clune <mailto:jim@parasoft.com>
> *Description:* Is it legal to have a BPEL process with two BPEL import elements
> each pointing to WSDLs of the same namespace, but different locations? The
> Document Linking section of the spec does not explicitly disallow this. One
> might interpret this situation as legal, and one might further interpret
> references to WSDL elements within such a process as resolving so long as each
> element resolves to one of the imported WSDLs for that namespace.
>
> The text should be clear.
> *Changes:* 23 Oct 2004 - new issue
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To comment on this issue (including whether it should be accepted), please
> follow-up to this announcement on the wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org list (replying
> to this message should automatically send your message to that list), or ensure
> the subject line as you send it *starts* "Issue - 174 - [anything]" or is a
> reply to such a message. If you want to formally propose a resolution to an open
> issue, please start the subject line "Issue - 174 - Proposed resolution",
> without any Re: or similar.
>
> To add a new issue, see the issues procedures document (but the address for new
> issue submission is the sender of this announcement).
>
>
> Choreology Anti virus scan completed
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster
of the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php.
|