Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 86 - Proposal For Vote

["Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com>]

If I may paraphrase "Future versions of X may support Y and Z. This 
specification says nothing about Y or Z."

Why is this statement necessary?

	Yaron

Monica J. Martin wrote:
> Proposal to vote, Issue 86 SOAP v1.2
> 
> Change in Section 3.0:
> 
> Change From:
> "With respect to [WS-I Basic Profile] (Basic Profile 1.0) all BPEL
> implementations SHOULD be configurable such that they can participate in
> Basic Profile 1.0 compliant interactions. A BPEL implementation MAY
> allow the Basic Profile 1.0 configuration to be disabled, even for
> scenarios encompassed by the Basic Profile 1.0."
> 
> Change To (add two sentences):
> "With respect to [WS-I Basic Profile] (Basic Profile 1.0) all BPEL
> implementations SHOULD be configurable such that they can participate in
> Basic Profile 1.0 compliant interactions. A BPEL implementation MAY
> allow the Basic Profile 1.0 configuration to be disabled, even for
> scenarios encompassed by the Basic Profile 1.0. Future versions of the
> WS-I Basic Profile may support the W3C SOAP v1.2 Recommendation and a
> subsequent WSDL v2.0 when complete in W3C. It is not the objective of
> this specification to define or require that particular protocol
> bindings be supported by compliant implementations."
> 
> Thanks.
> Submitted by: Ron Ten-Hove and Monica J. Martin
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the 
> OASIS TC), go to 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>