[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Issue 188 - I don't think we should open this issue in its currentform
As has been discussed at length in the list the behavior that is asked for in this issue would constitute new behavior in the spec and at a minimum I believe this issue is not a bug and is a request for a new feature. Assuming we intend to keep our current semantics I do believe there is an issue which is that the phrase "dead path elimination" can cause some confusion and so, as a purely editorial matter, we may want to choose another phrase or provide additional explanatory text. I think that opening an issue to track that would be useful but 188, as it is currently written, would not do that. Therefore I believe that either 188 should be re-written or be required to go through the 'new feature' approval process. Yaron
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]