Issue 86 - Proposal for Vote (Updated)

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

As referenced in Wednesday's call, updated verbiage:

"With respect to [WS-I Basic Profile v1.1] (Basic Profile v1.1) all 
BPEL  implementations SHOULD be configurable such that they can 
participate in  Basic Profile v1.1 compliant interactions. A BPEL 
implementation MAY allow the Basic Profile v1.1 configuration to be 
disabled, even for scenarios encompassed by the Basic Profile v1.1. At 
the time this specification was completed, the WSDL v2.0 work was 
ongoing and not ready for consideration for WS-BPEL v2.0. Future 
versions of WS-BPEL may provide support for WSDL v2.0."

This text reflects inputs from Yaron Goland, Ron Ten-Hove and myself. 
Thanks.