RE: [wsbpel] Groups - WS-BPEL 2.0 Candidate Committee Draft Mar. 16, 20

I will take a look at it, as I was the last one editing it. I didn't edit the examples in section 14, but it does seem as if the Word document got messed up.

Rgds,

From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:pyendluri@webmethods.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 5:39 PM
To: Ron Ten-Hove
Cc: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Groups - WS-BPEL 2.0 Candidate Committee Draft Mar. 16, 2006 (wsbpel-specification-draft-NM.htm) uploaded
Importance: High

Interesting. I noticed however though the word document itself has this problem (check the one I just sent out). So, it seems it is not a word->HTML conversion issue. The problem crept into the source at word level itself. We probably need an editorial action to review and fix these things.

Regards,
Prasad

-------- Original Message --------

Subject:	Re: [wsbpel] Groups - WS-BPEL 2.0 Candidate Committee Draft Mar. 16, 2006 (wsbpel-specification-draft-NM.htm) uploaded
Date:	Thu, 16 Mar 2006 20:30:34 -0500
From:	Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM>
To:	pyendluri@webmethods.com
CC:	wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
References:	20060316222020.1805.qmail@eos.oasis-open.org"><20060316222020.1805.qmail@eos.oasis-open.org> 4419F7D3.6060700@sun.com"><4419F7D3.6060700@sun.com> 441A05CA.1060708@webmethods.com"><441A05CA.1060708@webmethods.com>

Starting at section 14.1.1 (in the samples chapter), in the WSDL, you'll see a lot of odd substitutions, like:

       <message nam”e="shippingRequestM”sg">

              <part nam”e="shipOrd”er" typ”e="ship:shipOrd”er"/>

        </message>

There's a lot more after that; the corruptions really jump out at you.

I know it's too late for WS-BPEL, but if we used a stable format for the specification document we wouldn't run into issues like this.

-Ron

Prasad Yendluri wrote:

Hi Ron,

We seem to be having some word to HTML conversion issues. I did find a couple of places where the formatting got messed up and fixed.
I am not sure where you are seeing these odd characters. Regenerating would not help unfortunately as this is a word issue.

I am here with attaching the word version of the document, which I believe can also be obtained from sourceforge from here: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/wsbpeltc/specifications/

Note that this is a version with editorial mark-up that you can disable showing the mark-up, to get a clean view.

Hi Diane,

We seem to having issues with Editors using different versions of Word with the addition of new folks to the editing team. '

Regards,
Prasad

------- Original Message --------

Subject:	Re: [wsbpel] Groups - WS-BPEL 2.0 Candidate Committee Draft Mar. 16, 2006 (wsbpel-specification-draft-NM.htm) uploaded
Date:	Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:42:11 -0500
From:	Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM>
To:	pyendluri@webmethods.com
CC:	wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
References:	20060316222020.1805.qmail@eos.oasis-open.org"><20060316222020.1805.qmail@eos.oasis-open.org>

Prasad,

   The specification seems corrupted. A lot of odd characters seem to

have substituted themselves for the expected ones. Can you check the

original document, regenerate the HTML, and re-upload?

Thanks,

-Ron

pyendluri@webmethods.com wrote:

>The document named WS-BPEL 2.0 Candidate Committee Draft  Mar. 16, 2006

>(wsbpel-specification-draft-NM.htm) has been submitted by Prasad Yendluri

>to the OASIS Web Services Business Process Execution Language (WSBPEL) TC

>document repository.

>Document Description:

>This is the version with No Editorial Mark-up.

>View Document Details:

>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/document.php?document_id=17250

>Download Document:

>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/download.php/17250/wsbpel-specification-draft-NM.htm

>PLEASE NOTE:  If the above links do not work for you, your email application

>may be breaking the link into two pieces.  You may be able to copy and paste

>the entire link address into the address field of your web browser.

>-OASIS Open Administration

wsbpel message