[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 259 - Rename countCompletedBranchesOnly in forEach
Alejandro, the attribute actually resides on the branches element, but I agree with the rest - this branches element is only about the number of completed branches. <forEach ...> ... <completionCondition> <branches successfulBranchesOnly="yes"> 42 </branches> </completionCondition> ... </forEach> Kind Regards DK "Alejandro Guizar" <alex.guizar@jbos To s.com> Dieter Koenig1/Germany/IBM@IBMDE, "Danny van der Rijn" 06.04.2006 11:02 <dannyv@tibco.com> cc <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 259 - Rename countCompletedBranchesOnly in forEach successfulBranchesOnly does not make as much sense when you think about it separately. However, when you place it in the context of the forEach element: <forEach successfulBranchesOnly="yes" /> the word "count" becomes somewhat redundant - forEach already conveys the notion of counting. I like "successfulBranchesOnly", too. -Alejandro > -----Original Message----- > From: Dieter Koenig1 [mailto:dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 1:45 AM > To: Danny van der Rijn > Cc: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 259 - Rename countCompletedBranchesOnly in > forEach > > +1 -- "successfulBranchesOnly" is much better than the current attribute > as > it contains the most important piece: "successful". > > Kind Regards > DK > > > > > Danny van der > Rijn > <dannyv@tibco.com To > > wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org > cc > 06.04.2006 01:16 > Subject > Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 259 - Rename > countCompletedBranchesOnly in > forEach > > > > > > > > > > > I agree with your logic. Can we shorten it be removing "count": > "successfulBranchesOnly" > > Alejandro Guizar wrote: > +1, although the "Only" particle must remain to preserve the > original > meaning: 'countSuccessfulBranchesOnly' > > 'countSuccessfullyCompletedBranchesOnly' is way too long. > > -Alejandro > > > From: Danny van der Rijn [mailto:dannyv@tibco.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 11:27 AM > To: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 259 - Rename > countCompletedBranchesOnly > in forEach > > 'countSuccessfulBranches' ? > > ws-bpel issues list editor wrote: > > > This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list with a status of > "received". The status will be changed to "open" if a motion to open > the issue is proposed and that motion is approved by the TC. A > motion > could also be proposed to close it without further consideration. > Otherwise it will remain as "received". > > > The issues list is posted as a Technical Committee document to the > OASIS WSBPEL TC pages on a regular basis. The current edition, as a > TC document, is the most recent version of the document entitled in > the "Issues" folder of the WSBPEL TC document list - the next > posting > as a TC document will include this issue. The list editor's working > copy, which will normally include an issue when it is announced, is > available at this constant URL. > > > Issue - 259 - Rename countCompletedBranchesOnly in forEach > Status: received > Date added: 5 Apr 2006 > Categories: Syntax & validation > Date submitted: 05 April 2006 > Submitter: Simon D Moser > Document: WS-BPEL 2.0 Specfication (05 Apr 2006) > Description: WS-BPEL's forEach activity defines an attribute > "countCompletedBranchesOnly". In section 11.7 it is clearly defined > that a "completed" branch is only one that is sucessfully completed. > Therefore, to avoid confusion, the attribute should be renamed to > "countSuccessfullyCompletedBranchesOnly". > Submitter's proposal: Rename the forEach attribute > "countCompletedBranchesOnly" to > "countSuccessfullyCompletedBranchesOnly" in both the spec text > (wherever it occurs) and the BPEL Schema > Changes: 5 Apr 2006 - new issue > > > > To comment on this issue (including whether it should be accepted), > please follow-up to this announcement on the > wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org list (replying to this message should > automatically send your message to that list), or ensure the subject > line as you send it starts "Issue - 259 - [anything]" or is a reply > to such a message. If you want to formally propose a resolution to > an > open issue, please start the subject line "Issue - 259 - Proposed > resolution", without any Re: or similar. > > > To add a new issue, see the issues procedures document (but the > address for new issue submission is the sender of this > announcement). > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs > in > OASIS at: > https://www.oasis- > open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs > in > OASIS at: > https://www.oasis- > open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To > unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates > this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]