Re: [wsbpel] Problems with the latest schema

[Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com>]

Thomas,

Sure ... we can do a global replace from "bpws:" to "bpel:" for cosmetic 
consistency later. :-)

At the same time, I would like to remind people that we have not done 
the schema refactoring for Exec BPEL vs Abstract BPEL yet (also 
applicable to its profile as well)

Regards,
Alex Yiu

Thomas Schulze wrote:

>Hi Alex,
>
>just to be consistent with the spec text, in the schema the prefix "bpws:"
>is still used. Shouldn't it be replaced with "bpel:"?
>
>Best regards,
>
>       Thomas Schulze
>
>
>
>
>                                                                           
>             Alex Yiu                                                      
>             <ALEX.YIU@ORACLE.                                             
>             COM>                                                       To 
>                                       Alex Yiu <ALEX.YIU@ORACLE.COM>, Ron 
>             02.05.2006 21:53          Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM>, 
>                                       "'wsbpeltc'"                        
>                                       <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>       
>                                                                        cc 
>                                                                           
>                                                                   Subject 
>                                       Re: [wsbpel] Problems with the      
>                                       latest schema                       
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi Ron and others,
>
>Here is the updated schema (rev 1.36) that addresses the two problems that
>Ron pointed out.
>Thanks!
>
>Regards,
>Alex Yiu
>
>
>
>
>
>From Alex Yiu <ALEX.YIU@ORACLE.COM>
>Sent Tue 5/2/2006 12:17 PM
>To Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM>; 'wsbpeltc'
><wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>
>Cc alex.yiu@ORACLE.COM
>Subject Re: [wsbpel] Problems with the latest schema
>
>
>Hi Ron,
>
>Thank for you catching these problems.
>
>For the inconsistencies in the case of <if>-<then> and <messageExchange>,
>it is related to the issues (e.g. issue 237) was applied to the spec text
>but not to XSD.
>
>I am going to apply these 2 changes during the lunch break here.
>
>On the other hand, I am not sure I follow you 100% on "tExtensionActivity
>has had a namespace attribute added to the any child. There is no mention
>of this, as far as I can find, in the latest draft specification. (If this
>an attempt to say ##other?)" It seems to me that you want to ask for a
>clarification spec text, but not on the XSD itself (since the XSD cannot
>and does not have any grammar enforcement on the "xsd:any" child).  Do I
>follow you correctly?
>
>Thanks!
>
>
>Regards,
>Alex Yiu
>
>
>
>
>From Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM>
>Sent Tue 5/2/2006 6:11 AM
>To 'wsbpeltc' <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>
>Subject Re: [wsbpel] Problems with the latest schema
>
>Oh, and <messageExchanges> and <messageExchange> are missing from the
>schema.
>
>Are these inconsistencies worth opening an issue (or three?) about, to
>resolve them, or do we just assume the specification is correct and the
>schema just needs a bit of editing?
>
>-Ron
>
>Ron Ten-Hove wrote:
>      There are some inconsistencies between the specification text and the
>      "snapshot" of the schema Alex sent out April 29th.
>            <if><then>. The production for <if> includes a <then> element,
>            where the specification just calls for an activity.
>            tExtensionActivity has had a namespace attribute added to the
>            any child. There is no mention of this, as far as I can find,
>            in the latest draft specification. (If this an attempt to say
>            ##other?)
>      Cheers,
>      -Ron(See attached file: wsbpel_main.xsd)
>      ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>      To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>      generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs
>      in OASIS
>      at:
>      https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>  
>