Subject: Do URIs for capabilities include date?
Hi all, I believe at the F2F I volunteers to lead the discussion on whether the URIs used to represent capabilities should include the date of the spec in them or not. I'd like to suggest that they do, for this reason: we don't know at this point how the spec will evolve and whether we will later decide to redefine the capabilities or not. But even if we decide not to, it is not a problem to have a date in the URI. W3C specs have the release date in their targetnamespace. This doesn't imply that the namespace will be obsoleted. It just makes it more convenient to do so if we decide to. So I propose that we keep using the same URI format that we use throughout the document, including the date (to the month). Regards, William