Fw: Process Question from WSDM

[Heather Kreger <kreger@us.ibm.com>]

Hi All, 
Here's the answer on the editorial changes.

We'll be able to make these. 

Sincererly,
Heather Kreger
STSM, Management Standards Architecture and Strategy
Standards, Software Group, IBM
Author of "Java and JMX: Building Manageable Systems"
kreger@us.ibm.com
919-543-3211 (t/l 441)  cell:919-496-9572

----- Forwarded by Heather
Kreger/Raleigh/IBM on 05/12/2006 11:09 PM -----

Mary McRae <marypmcrae@gmail.com>

05/12/2006 10:40 PM

Please respond to
<mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>

To	Heather Kreger/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc
Subject	RE: Process Question from WSDM

Hi Heather!
 
  No penalty incurred for
non-substantive changes. Make the changes, vote to make CD. Then vote to
have TC Admin start ballot to approve as CS. You'll have to wait until
public review is over before doing that. Simultaneous to that request,
you can vote to have TC Admin start a ballot to submit for OS vote. Usually
those 2 ballots run together - the first is for CS, and the second is for
OS submission assuming the ballot for CS passes. Saves a week that way.
The ballots must run for 7 days.
 
  Sounds like you should
have plenty of time to submit for standard vote on May 15 (ballot would
run June 16-30). The submission details are given in the TC process: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#3.4
 
This is done by sending me an
email with each of the requisite items listed.
 
Let me know if you need further
help!
 
All the best,

Mary

---

From: Heather Kreger [mailto:kreger@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 7:18 PM
To: Mary McRae
Cc: jamie.clark@oasis-open.org
Subject: Process Question from WSDM


Hi Mary, 
I have a question on the standards process.. 

If we have 3 changes outlined here, basically editorial and not substantive
at all, how will that affect our exist from Public Review and submission
for standard? 

In the process it says what to do with substantive changes but it doesn't
say anything about what to do with non substantive changes.   
Do we just make the changes and vote it CD?  
Publish an erratta? 

Also, we exit PR 5/19 and will be ready to do a special ballot that you
need to set up for submitting for standard... 
What else do you need to do that? 

Sincererly,
Heather Kreger
STSM, Management Standards Architecture and Strategy
Standards, Software Group, IBM
Author of "Java and JMX: Building Manageable Systems"
kreger@us.ibm.com
919-543-3211 (t/l 441)  cell:919-496-9572



TC call mintues:=20
Discussed public comments and process  today:=20

Reviewd comments from CA attatched to bottom.=20

Proposed editorial changes to WSDM MUWS Part 1.=20

Line  127 - Remove car engine

Line 128 - change WSRF to WS

Line 143 - The definition of Manageability Capacity Interface should be=20
eliminated (it is not longer used in the specificaiton).  The definition=20
of Manageability Interface should be changed to "A Web service interface=20
that exposes interfaces for one or more manageability capabilities."

Exit Public Comment on 5/19.=20
Heather needs to=20
1. see how to treat 'non substantive changes' in the process.  If
this=20
causes re-review of the spec then we may choose not to do this.=20
2. see how long a CD special ballot takes - ballot or  phone?=20
3. run simultaneous with approval to submit - ballot or phone?=20

Heather Kreger
STSM, Web Services Lead Architect for SWG Emerging Technologies
Author of "Java and JMX: Building Manageable Systems"
kreger@us.ibm.com
919-543-3211 (t/l 441)  cell:919-496-9572

----- Forwarded by Heather Kreger/Raleigh/IBM on 05/11/2006 12:35 PM -----

comment-form@oasis-open.org=20
04/14/2006 09:33 AM
Please respond to
kirk.wilson@ca.com


To
wsdm-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
cc

Subject
[wsdm-comment] Public Comment






Comment from: kirk.wilson@ca.com

Name: Kirk Wilson
Title:  Architect, office of CTO
Organization: CA, Inc.
Regarding Specification:  WSDM MUWS 1.1

Comments regarding definitions in section 1.1 of MUWS Part 1.

1.  Line 127: a "car engine" is not an intutively obvious
example of an IT =

resource.

2.  The definition of "WSRF Resource" is actually the definition
of a=20
WS-Resource in the WS-Resource specification.  It is not clear why
another =

term needs to be introduced in this spec for this technical concept.  This
=

can only lead to confusion.  I suspect that what is intended by "WSRF=20
Resource" in WSDM is what the WS-R specification defines as a "resource",=20
namely:
A resource is a logical entity that has the following characteristics:
? It MUST be identifiable.
? It MUST have a set of zero or more properties, which are expressible
in=20
XML infoset.
? It MAY have lifecycle.
MUWS should (1) introduce the preceding definition as the definition of=20
"WSRF Resource" and (2) change the term "WSRF Resource"
to "WS-Resource"=20
in line 128.  (Also, the definition should be made more explicit by=20
referring to "WSRF Resource" rather than simply "resource".

3.  The definition of Manageability Capacity Interface should be=20
eliminated (it is not longer used in the specificaiton).  The definition=20
of Manageability Interface should be changed to "A Web service interface=20
that exposes one or more manageability capabilities."


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: wsdm-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: wsdm-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org