RE: Issue 18: Review normative RFC 2119 language in WS-Federation

I’ve gone through the latest editor’s draft, applied RFC 2119 edits and attached a copy. It’s big, but experience elsewhere indicates that people need to see the changes in context in order to review them.

Thanks,

-greg

From: Marc Goodner
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 10:10 AM
To: Greg Carpenter; wsfed@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Issue 18: Review normative RFC 2119 language in WS-Federation

Issue 18

From: Greg Carpenter [mailto:gregcarp@microsoft.com]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 6:37 PM
To: wsfed@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsfed] New Issue: Review normative RFC 2119 language in WS-Federation

PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSISON THREAD UNTIL THE ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER.

The issues coordinators will notify the list when that has occurred.

Protocol: ws-federation

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=27579&wg_abbrev=wsfed

Artifact: spec

Type: editorial

Title: Review normative RFC 2119 language in WS-Federation

Description:

WS-Federation should be reviewed for consistent use of RFC 2119 terminology and updated as appropriate.

wsfed message