OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsia message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Subject: RE: [wsia] OASIS-W3C relationships for WSIA

Title: RE: [wsia] OASIS-W3C relationships for WSIA
I would add the Final Requirements of the Architecture Group (I think they are still working on it) would be useful for WSIA. All our use case Requirements (Embedded, Customized...) can compare with the broad-level Requirements of the W3C Architecture Group - as a cross reference I would expect they conform to each other for the most part.
Srinivas Vadhri
-----Original Message-----
From: Rex Brooks [mailto:rexb@starbourne.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 8:02 AM
To: Eilon Reshef
Cc: 'Charles F Wiecha'; wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [wsia] OASIS-W3C relationships for WSIA

I concur. I have followed the discussion of XMLP on xml-dev and it has fizzled for lack of controversy or specifics I imagine, but it may solve the one aspect of Web Services for which I have yet to find the appropriate forum, mainly that we need a way to pre-secure the channels for a set of services or at least check them and make sure that the channels are open and available for transmission before a full session is engaged. For the simplest embedded, or fire-and-forget use cases from wsia producers it is not a problem, but onward from that point it becomes problematic in a range from minor to absolute.


At 10:07 AM -0500 4/4/02, Eilon Reshef wrote:
I would add XMLP, just in case we have some requirements around transport of HTML documents, around meta-definitions and interface support, etc.
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles F Wiecha [mailto:wiecha@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 9:49 AM
To: wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsia] OASIS-W3C relationships for WSIA

Folks -- here's my draft response to Karl around potential liaison
relationships between WSIA and W3C...please post any comments or
suggestions for additions. I need to get back to him later on today.
Thanks, Charlie
Karl -- in addition to the Web Services Architecture WG, it would be useful
for WSIA to have relationships with the following W3C working groups and
activities:. (1) XFORMS, (2) on-going work around XLINK or other approaches
to separating linking from documents, and XPOINTER,  (3) XPATH, and (5)
multimodal interaction.
Our work will draw more broadly from other working groups, such as Schema,
SOAP, DOM, HTML and so on, but we can probably track those groups without
the need for a more formal liaison relationship.
Charlie Wiecha

-----Original Message-----
From: Karl F. Best [mailto:karl.best@oasis-open.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 11:20 AM
To: chairs
Subject: [chairs] relations with W3C

The managements of OASIS and of W3C have been in conversation the last
couple of months about how the two organizations could better be working
together. As part of our discussions W3C has asked for specific problems
or concerns that should be addressed.
In preparation for our next meeting at the end of next week I would like
to hear from any of the OASIS TCs that now have or could have a liaison
relationship with a W3C working group or activity, or whose technical
work in some way overlaps or relates to their work.
Please let me know what specific issues your TC may have including but
not limited to obstacles to working together, divergent goals, IP
issues, scheduling issues, what groups you need to work with, etc.

Karl F. Best
OASIS - Director, Technical Operations
+1 978.667.5115 x206
karl.best@oasis-open.org  http://www.oasis-open.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Powered by eList eXpress LLC