[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: WSIA 5/8/2002: [wsia][wsia-requirements][E901]
Did you mean statefulness instead of state?
Monica Martin
<mmartin@certivo. To: Eilon Reshef <eilon.reshef@webcollage.com>,
net> wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
cc:
05/08/2002 11:42 Subject: WSIA 5/8/2002: [wsia][wsia-requirements][E901]
PM
A Consumer MUST be capable of determining the state of a
Producer-provided, WSIA Web Service.
Thank you.
Monica J. Martin
Program Manager
Drake Certivo, Inc.
208.585.5946
-----Original Message-----
From: Eilon Reshef
Sent: Sat 5/4/2002 3:44 PM
To: wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc:
Subject: [wsia][wsia-requirements][E901]
E901
The specification must provide means for Consumers to
determine
if a Producer is a stateless WSIA Web Service. Debate: ER, SA, R, TJ.
_____
Although API-wise it may make sense that statefulness is
explicit, can we word the requirement in a way that doesn't mandate it.
For example:
The specification must provide means for Consumers to behave
consistently(?), whether a Producer is a stateful or a stateless WSIA
Web Service.
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC