Re: [wsn] [Namespace URIs] Proposal to split the existing namespaces

[Steve Graham <sggraham@us.ibm.com>]

Hi Fred:
Yep, the WSN base was a critical change
in v 0.2 of the proposal.  This reflects the OASIS web site design
and therefore what we should use as resolvable URIs.

With regard to your suggestion on Action
URIs, I am not sure that would work with respect to resolvability.  Interesting
thought tho.

sgg

++++++++
Steve Graham
(919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
STSM, On Demand Architecture
Member, IBM Academy of Technology
<Soli Deo Gloria/>
++++++++

Fred Carter <fred.carter@amberpoint.com> 05/11/2004 04:11 PM Please respond to fred.carter

To:        Steve Graham/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS         cc:        wsn@lists.oasis-open.org         Subject:        Re: [wsn] [Namespace URIs] Proposal to split the existing namespaces

+1

I think the only concern I had was that we link things to WSN.  If
I'm 
understanding your intent correctly, that's amongst the changes in 
version 2 of the proposed draft.  So that seems fine.

This one is purely a question.  I have no strong opinion one way or
the 
other.  Just a thought... Since we're going for resolvability of URI's,
might it make sense to have things like BaseAction URI's resolve to 
their sections in the schema?  We appear to be close, in that (say,
for 
subscribe) we are using the schema location with the action name appended
     http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsn/2004/05/WS-BaseNotification/Subscribe

I don't know if it would be possible to do something like change the 
"/Subscribe" to a "#Subscribe".  It's probably
overkill, and, as I said, 
I don't know who xlink/xptr/anchors work in schemas (or even if...).

Anyway, just a thought in the spirit of 'resolvability'.

/fred

Thus quoth Steve Graham (~ 11-May-04 12:59 PM ~)...

> 
> *Folks:*
> *In [1] I proposed a mapping from the namespace URI convention used
in 
> version 1.1 of WS-notification specs to one based on the OASIS file
> naming and related URI namespace conventions.*
> 
> *The submitted version of WS-Notification used a single URI namespace
> per specification for both the XSD and WSDL.  Given that we are
trying 
> to adopt a direct mapping from URI to URL for our XSD and WSDL, we
> should change this pattern to having separate URI namespaces for the
XSD 
> and WSDL.*
> 
> *Does anyone object to adopting this change in namespace URIs for
the 
> 0.1 draft of the OASIS work on WS-Notification?*
> 
> 
> *[1**]*_http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsn/download.php/6710/Proposed%20WS-Notification%20URIs.2.doc_
> 
> sgg
> ++++++++
> Steve Graham
> (919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
> STSM, On Demand Architecture
> Member, IBM Academy of Technology
> <Soli Deo Gloria/>
> ++++++++


-- 
Fred Carter / AmberPoint, Inc.

mailto:fred.carter@amberpoint.com
tel:+1.510.433.6525 fax:+1.510.663.6301