Fw: documenting pseudo schema lang

[Steve Graham <sggraham@us.ibm.com>]

(Cross-post from the WSDL WG in W3C)

Note: Per the WSRF TC telecon yesterday
[1], there was discussion from Jeff and Anish about the description of
the pseudo schema and the text in the terminology and notation section
of each document.  I got some time to further review this text, and
see what other WS-* specs use and realize that the current text in the
WSRF (and WSN) specs don't really properly cover the pseudo-schema notation.

It seems that WSDL 2.0 WG has a similar
"to do".  I propose that whatever text the editors of WSDL
2.0 spec draft is the text we should insert into the notation and terminology
section of WSRF and WSN specs to properly explain the pseudo-schema notation.

[1]http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrf/download.php/7266

sgg
++++++++
Steve Graham
(919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
STSM, On Demand Architecture
Member, IBM Academy of Technology
<Soli Deo Gloria/>
++++++++

----- Forwarded by Steve
Graham/Raleigh/IBM on 06/15/2004 10:37 AM -----

"Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 06/15/2004 10:35 AM

To:        <www-ws-desc@w3.org>         cc:                 Subject:        documenting pseudo schema lang

We use a "natural" pseudo-schema language in the spec in the
XML
syntax fragments and summary. However, unless I missed something
its not documented .. this is an editorial task but obviously
critical!

Sanjiva.