[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Public Comment
Comment from: masahiro.kurosawa.kc@hitachi.com Name: Masahiro Kurosawa Title: Re: Give us more examples about MembershipContentRule Organization: Hitachi, ltd. Regarding Specification: WS ServiceGroup 1.2 pr02 (http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/14802/wsrf-ws_service_group-1.2-spec-pr-02.pdf) - - - Thanks for your time and help on my question (Issue WSRF154). About question #2 and #3, I completely understand. Thanks again for your recommendations. But, about question #1, I meant to say '{http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrf/2004/11/wsrf-WS-ResourceLifetime-1.2-draft-04.wsdl} ImmediateResourceTermination'. Intention of this question is: - When a ServiceGroup WS-Resource wants its ServiceGroupEntrie WS-Resources to support the operation(s) of ImmediateResourceTermination portType in their portType - and Name of that portTypes are actually something like '{http://entry1.com/services}SomePortType', - should it specify '{http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrf/2004/11/wsrf-WS-ResourceLifetime-1.2-draft-04.wsdl} ImmediateResourceTermination' in MemberInterfaces attribute, or '{http://entry1.com/services}SomePortType'? I think the former one is right because the names of portTypes are of great variety and it's meaningless to specify '{http://entry1.com/services}SomePortType'. But, I could not decide it. Yes, I'll be able to understand after getting the examples. Thanks.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]