Reopen Issue WSRF110

[Tom Maguire <tmaguire@us.ibm.com>]

The proposed recommendation to WSRF110 was the addtion of an xs:any ##other
to the BaseFaultType.  This introduces a schema validation error for
extensions.

Text from Peter Niblett:
If you extend the BFType in another namespace (as we do) and add extra
elements in that extension, then the schema that does the extension (e.g.
WSN)  violates the Unique Particle Attribution constraint as it becomes
non-determnistic. This is because BaseFaultType ends with <xs:any
namespace="##other" minOccurs="0">. So in the extended fault type you can't
tell whether elements in an extended instance are to be validated by this
<any> or by the elements in the extended type


We need to reopen and revisit the proposed recommendation (and subsequent
action).



Tom


Frey’s Law: “Every 5 years the number of architecture components double and
the ability to comprehend them halves”


Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when
there is nothing left to take away.   – Antoine de Saint-Exupery


T o m   M a g u i r e


STSM, On Demand Architecture


Poughkeepsie, NY  12601