OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsrf message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [wsrf] Fwd: WS-addressing reference in WSRF-RP


Tom Maguire wrote:

>Tom,
>
>I absolutely agree with the sentiment.  The stated intent of the WSRF TC is
>to wait until WS-Addressing goes to recommendation status before taking
>WSRF specs to standard.  At that point the reference:
>http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-addr-core will be the correct one.
>Are you suggesting that we update the WSRF specs after Public Review to
>point to the reference: http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ws-addr-core-20050331?
>  
>
I would rather wait until after the Public review to make this 
decision.  It depends on the stability at that time of both wsrf and ws 
addressing.

I was referring in my email below to the current versions of the document.

Tom Rutt

>I am not sure what that would accomplish, certainly the TC needs to be
>aware of any changes that occur in WS-Addressing core from 20050331 to
>recommendation status, but I think the reference in the PR is fundamentally
>expressing the intent of the standard.
>
>Tom
>
>Frey’s Law: “Every 5 years the number of architecture components double and
>the ability to comprehend them halves”
>
>
>Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when
>there is nothing left to take away.   – Antoine de Saint-Exupery
>
>
>T o m   M a g u i r e
>
>
>STSM, On Demand Architecture
>
>
>Poughkeepsie, NY  12601
>
>Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> wrote on 06/20/2005 08:24:08 AM:
>
>  
>
>>Tom Maguire wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I looked at this when it was brought up on the OGSA call.  My (perhaps
>>>uninformed) view is that the correct reference is
>>>http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-addr-core given that when WS-Addr goes to
>>>recommendation status this is where the recommendation specification
>>>      
>>>
>will
>  
>
>>>reside.  In other words, that URL 'is' the stable reference for the
>>>recommendation level.
>>>
>>>Tom
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>We need to be careful here.  We are using namespaces in our wsrf specs
>>which are defined in the last call spec
>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ws-addr-core-20050331
>>
>>This is where these namespaces are defined.  When the ws addressing core
>>spec progresses, there could be differences in the schema, which
>>would result in a different namespace applying.  We have to ensure that
>>we correctly reference the proper version of the ws-addressing core
>>to avoid confusion, since both our wsrf spec and their ws-addressing
>>specs are still evolving.
>>
>>Tom Rutt
>>Fujitsu
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Frey’s Law: “Every 5 years the number of architecture components double
>>>      
>>>
>and
>  
>
>>>the ability to comprehend them halves”
>>>
>>>
>>>Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when
>>>there is nothing left to take away.   – Antoine de Saint-Exupery
>>>
>>>
>>>T o m   M a g u i r e
>>>
>>>
>>>STSM, On Demand Architecture
>>>
>>>
>>>Poughkeepsie, NY  12601
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>
>>>            David Snelling
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>
>>>            <David.Snelling@U
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>
>>>            K.Fujitsu.com>
>>>      
>>>
>To
>  
>
>>>                                      WSRF <wsrf@lists.oasis-open.org>
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>
>>>            06/19/2005 02:22
>>>      
>>>
>cc
>  
>
>>>            PM
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>
>Subject
>  
>
>>>                                      [wsrf] Fwd: WS-addressing
>>>      
>>>
>reference
>  
>
>>>                                      in WSRF-RP
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>
>
>  
>
>
>  
>
>
>  
>
>
>  
>
>
>  
>
>
>  
>
>>>
>>>
>>>Folks,
>>>
>>>The following came in from a Fujitsu colleague. I this an issue or is
>>>it just another statement of the fact that WS-A references will need to
>>>be fixed after Public Review?
>>>
>>>Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>We find that the current WS-addressing reference in WSRF-RP 1.2 CD
>>>>is inappropriate. In its normative reference section on page 44,
>>>>It refer to WS-addressing at "http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-addr-core.";
>>>>This address is always for the latest version and will be updated
>>>>in the future. You should refer to
>>>>"http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ws-addr-core-20050331"; instead.
>>>>
>>>>Namespaces on page 7 says that wsa is
>>>>"http://www.w3.org/2005/03/addressing."; I think it's better to
>>>>update the reference maybe by errata?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>--
>>>
>>>Take care:
>>>
>>>    Dr. David Snelling < David . Snelling . UK . Fujitsu . com >
>>>    Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe
>>>    Hayes Park Central
>>>    Hayes End Road
>>>    Hayes, Middlesex  UB4 8FE
>>>
>>>    +44-208-606-4649 (Office)
>>>    +44-208-606-4539 (Fax)
>>>    +44-7768-807526  (Mobile)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>--
>>----------------------------------------------------
>>Tom Rutt   email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com
>>Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>  
>


-- 
----------------------------------------------------
Tom Rutt	email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com
Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]