RE: [wsrf] Reopen Issue WSRF110

["Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Maguire [mailto:tmaguire@us.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Monday, Jun 20, 2005 9:38 AM
> To: wsrf@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [wsrf] Reopen Issue WSRF110
> 
> The proposed recommendation to WSRF110 was the addtion of an 
> xs:any ##other
> to the BaseFaultType.  This introduces a schema validation error for
> extensions.
> 
> Text from Peter Niblett:
> If you extend the BFType in another namespace (as we do) and add extra
> elements in that extension, then the schema that does the 
> extension (e.g.
> WSN)  violates the Unique Particle Attribution constraint as 
> it becomes
> non-determnistic. This is because BaseFaultType ends with <xs:any
> namespace="##other" minOccurs="0">. So in the extended fault 
> type you can't
> tell whether elements in an extended instance are to be 
> validated by this
> <any> or by the elements in the extended type
> 
> 
> We need to reopen and revisit the proposed recommendation 
> (and subsequent
> action).
> 
> 
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> Frey's Law: "Every 5 years the number of architecture 
> components double and
> the ability to comprehend them halves"
> 
> 
> Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to 
> add, but when
> there is nothing left to take away.   - Antoine de Saint-Exupery
> 
> 
> T o m   M a g u i r e
> 
> 
> STSM, On Demand Architecture
> 
> 
> Poughkeepsie, NY  12601
>