OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsrm message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [wsrm] [Fwd: Re: Our original Reliability spec] -encouraging broader participation


I agree 100% with what Doug wrote

To encourage broader participation, why not invite other companies that are not now participating in our TC to review our WS-RM Reqts doc with the intention of then submitting a multi-company contribution which would enhance/ augment it.  

Alternatively, they could submit a  contribution detailing how their spec(s) meet our WS-RM Reqts document, with the actual spec(s) submitted as a companion contribution.

If we reach consensus on such an invitation, perhaps Tom could send it via email to selected individuals (I think I could compile a partial email list) by late next week

Could this be a topic for Tuesday's conference call?

Alan Weissberger
NEC-Labs America

----- Original Message -----
From: Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 14:53:44 -0700
To: tom@coastin.com
Subject: Re: [wsrm] [Fwd: Re: Our original  Reliability spec] 

> On 11-Jul-03 08:06, Tom Rutt wrote:
> > I agree with you.  Thus anyone who uses the URL MUST BE AWARE   of any 
> > encumbrances
> > attached to it.
> > 
> > Please read the IPR and license terms before you do anything with the 
> > URLs I sent out.
> Alternatively, do *nothing* with the information at the provided URLs in 
> the context of this TC to avoid violating the charter [1] of this group, 
> especially our Standing Rules.  We are here to discuss our 
> specification, any formal submissions and not every published reliable 
> delivery white paper.
> We should strongly encourage the submission of additional technical work 
> from all sources to avoid confusion, industry division and overall 
> fragmentation of Web services standards.  Additional peer review and 
> input throughout the life cycle of this TC specification will also 
> improve it technically.
> As our charter says [1], "Other contributions in addition to 
> WS-Reliability will be accepted for consideration without any prejudice 
> or restrictions, and evaluated on their technical merit, as long as the 
> contributions conform to this charter."
> > Tom Rutt
> ...
> thanx,
> 	doug
> [1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/wsrm/charter.php
> You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/leave_workgroup.php

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]