[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrm] Working Draft 0.52
John, John Fuller wrote: > Section 3, Message Format, Figure 4, > What does the acknowledgement message really look like now? Ack. msg. will have a Response Header with RefToGroupId and an optional RefToSequenceNumber. > > > The drawing is very different from the precommittee draft, but I'm > having trouble > finding discussions about or specifications for the revised > acknowledgement message. See the resolutions and/or F2F meeting minutes for details. It does capture the resolutions we closed on or before Sep 5th except for 2 minor ones: 1) ReplyTo is not a sub-element, rather an attribute. 2) Fault doesn't have Fault Code sub-element. > > > The drawing shows Fault now built into the header instead of sent as an > extension > of a SOAP fault. SOAP Fault is indeed sent in the Body itself. However, the <detail> information is sent in Header as required by SOAP 1.1 > > > The drawing also indicates something is above the response in sequence. > Is the message header still part of the acknowledgement? Ack. response also has a MessageHeader. > > A timestamp and group id might be useful for troubleshooting > and continue the concept of a "header" element for RM messages. -Sunil > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/leave_workgroup.php.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]