[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Suggestion for Rel 119
We need exact proposed replacement text, not just an outline. Sunil, can you provide the exact text changes and new text to go along with the new attribute of reply to for poll response?. Your outline, reproduced below, does not include exact text to include. Tom Rutt WSRM Chair ------ Rel 119 Sunil new Issue on Callback for Poll Request * *New Issue* <http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200402/msg00203.html> /From/ Sunil Kunisetty <Sunil.Kunisetty@oracle.com> on 24 Feb 2004 00:50:10 -0000 New mail from Sunil: If we do accept this, here are the changes that we need to do. 1. Add an optional replyTo attribute to PollRequest 2. pg 6/line 177: Remove the replyTo attribute for Poll pattern in Request (this may contradict to what I said in the editorial comments...) 3. pg 7/line 212:Title of Example 3 would read "Acknowledgment Message embedded in HTTP Request" 4. pg 7/line 213:HTTP Headers will have to change (should use POST) 5. pg 8/line 239:Title of Example 4 would read "Fault Message embedded in HTTP Request" 6. pg 8/line 240:HTTP Headers will have to change (should use POST) 7. pg 11/lines 334-339 should be reworded as follows: We say that Polling RM-Reply pattern is used if a second underlying request is issued to the receiver of a previous message, in order to obtain a RM-Reply. The RM-Reply can be either contained in the underlying response to this poll request or in a separate underlying request from the receiver to the sender. This poling pattern is generally expected to be used in situations where it is inappropriate for the sender of reliable messages to receive underlying protocol requests (behind the firewall cases) or to avoid resending bulk messages often. 1. pg 15/Figure 3. The 3rd line should be titled "Underlying protocol Response/Request". 2. pg 28/section 4.3 1. Table 9: Add an optional attribute call replyTo of type anyURI 2. We need to mention that RM-Reply MUST be contained in the underlying response of the Poll request if this attribute doesn't exist and should be sent in an underlying request to the endpoint identified by this attribute if exists. 3. And finally the schema has to reflect this by adding an optional attribute to the PollRequest element. -Sunil ------ Sunil moves to accept his proposal and to add the clarification below: Seconded by Jishu clarify that reply to is not allowed for a poll and response reply pattern request. No opposition, accepted. -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@fsw.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]