Re: [wsrm] Suggestion for Rel 119

[Sunil Kunisetty <Sunil.Kunisetty@oracle.com>]

>  
> >
> >  This is the exact change that needs to be done. Add an attribute
> by name
> > replyTo (anyURI) in row 3.
> >
> >
> We need the exact text to explain the use of this attribute in this
> poll
> request.
>  
 See below in red color. That's the only thing we need.
>  
> Can you provide this?
>  

>  
> >
> >
> >>         2. We need to mention
> that RM-Reply MUST be contained in the
> >>underlying response of the Poll request if this attribute doesn't
> exist
> >>and should be sent  in an underlying request to the endpoint
> identified
> >>by this attribute if exists.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Append  the sentence "RM-Reply MUST
> be contained in the
> >underlying response of the Poll request
> if the replyTo  attribute doesn't exist
> >and should be sent  in an underlying
> request to the endpoint identified
> >by this attribute if exists."
> to the sentence ending on line 838 (in v0.991 draft).
> >
> >
> >