RE: [wsrp-conformance] [AS075]

[Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>]

Good catch ... what if the word "only"
is deleted from the suggested new version? Would probably also need to
restrict it to the next invocation ....

Rich Thompson

Andre Kramer <andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com> 04/15/2003 04:12 AM

To:        Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS         cc:                 Subject:        RE: [wsrp-conformance] [AS075]

The new would allow a null sessionID
to be used after the clone?
-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Thompson [mailto:richt2@us.ibm.com]
Sent: 15 April 2003 02:46
To:         wsrp-conformance@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsrp-conformance] [AS075]


Old: 
When the Producer returns a new PortletContext.portletHandle without returning
a new SessionContext.sessionID, the Consumer shall associate any current
sessionID with the newly returned portletHandle for this End-User.

New: 
When the Producer returns a new PortletContext.portletHandle without returning
a new SessionContext.sessionID, the Consumer shall only supply the RuntimeContext.sessionID
sent on this invocation when also supplying the newly returned portletHandle
in Portletcontext.portletHandle for this End-User.

Rich Thompson