OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsrp-conformance message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [wsrp-conformance] [AS096]


Title:
But what does fail mean? Not crash?  I suspect Andre may mean that fail means throws an exception which should certainly be valid in this situation.  Are you suggesting that an exception isn't a reasonable fallback?
     -Mike-

Rich Thompson wrote:

Because the conformance statement says the Producer needs to have a reasonable fallback.

Rich Thompson




Andre Kramer <andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com>

04/15/2003 04:21 AM

       
        To:        Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, wsrp-conformance@lists.oasis-open.org
        cc:        
        Subject:        RE: [wsrp-conformance] [AS096]



Why should they not be allowed to fail? The portlet may not be able to render any content if it can not work out who / what the user is?
-----Original Message-----
From:
Rich Thompson [mailto:richt2@us.ibm.com]
Sent:
15 April 2003 02:46
To:
wsrp-conformance@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject:
[wsrp-conformance] [AS096]


Old:

Producers shall be prepared for Consumer invocations that do not specify any user category.


New:

Invocations of Producer operations shall not fail just because the Consumer did not specify any user categories.


Rich Thompson




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]