[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrp-conformance] [AS096]
Because the conformance statement says the Producer needs to have a reasonable fallback.
Rich Thompson
Andre Kramer <andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com> 04/15/2003 04:21 AM
To: Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, wsrp-conformance@lists.oasis-open.org
cc:
Subject: RE: [wsrp-conformance] [AS096]
Why should they not be allowed to fail? The portlet may not be able to render any content if it can not work out who / what the user is?
-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Thompson [mailto:richt2@us.ibm.com]
Sent: 15 April 2003 02:46
To: wsrp-conformance@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsrp-conformance] [AS096]
Old:
Producers shall be prepared for Consumer invocations that do not specify any user category.
New:
Invocations of Producer operations shall not fail just because the Consumer did not specify any user categories.
Rich Thompson
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]