RE: [wsrp-conformance] Simple Producer => stateless?

["Kropp, Alan" <Alan.Kropp@vignette.com>]

Yes, I think that's clearer.

 

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Thompson [mailto:richt2@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 10:44 AM
To: wsrp-conformance@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsrp-conformance] Simple Producer => stateless?

Alan, Thanks for starting the use profile document for us ... it will certainly help drive the discussion forward!

The description of the Simple Producer stumbles around a bit on this issue of being stateless. It is first described as stateless and then descriptions of persistent and transient state follow. Perhaps the key is that there is no local state. This would mean that all persistent state is pushed to the Consumer as portletState (& registrationState if registration is supported) and all transient state is captured in navigationalState.

Rich Thompson