wsrp-conformance message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: [wsrp-conformance] [AS009] xsi:type attribute on extensions element
- From: Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>
- To: wsrp-conformance@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 13:03:12 -0400
Seeing the extensions element in a message
David Ward posted the other day set off bells about type specification.
Both CS009 (Each such extension MUST declare its type using the schema-defined
“type” attribute) and AS009 (Every time an extension element appears
in a WSRP message, it shall use the xsi:type attribute to declare its type)
are a bit to vague. I would propose changing AS009 to:
"Every time an extension element
appears in a WSRP message, its child element shall use the xsi:type attribute
to declare its type".
This make it explicit where the type
information is to go and is consistent with the definition of xsi:type
(provides the type for the element where it is specified).
Rich Thompson
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]