Re: [wsrp-interfaces] interactionFieldPrefix and namespacing form params

[Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>]

The use case which needs us to keep
the model clean between portletInstanceKey and any prefixes is when the
Consumer wants to show two views from a single portlet instance (i.e. shared
runtime state). An example of this would be showing both a normal view
and a contextualized help view. Sharing the runtime state allows the help
view to relate to what the normal view is showing. The current model has
portletInstanceKey for namespacing within the Producer and the prefixes
for namespacing within the browser and I think it is important to keep
these concepts separated.

Rich

Richard Jacob <richard.jacob@de.ibm.com>

09/01/05 06:13 AM

To	Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
cc	wsrp-interfaces@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject	Re: [wsrp-interfaces] interactionFieldPrefix and namespacing form params

comments in <rj><rj>

Mit freundlichen Gruessen / best regards,

        Richard Jacob
______________________________________________________
IBM Lab Boeblingen, Germany
Dept.8288, WebSphere Portal Server Development
WSRP Team Lead & Technical Lead
WSRP Standardization
Phone: ++49 7031 16-3469  -  Fax: ++49 7031 16-4888
Email: mailto:richard.jacob@de.ibm.com


                    
                     
                     
          
             Rich Thompson    
                     
                     
             <richt2@us.ibm.co  
                     
                    
             m>        
                     
                     
    To 
                    
                  wsrp-interfaces@lists.oasis-open.or
             08/31/2005 09:55    
     g              
                    
             PM        
                     
                     
    cc 
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
  Subject 
                    
                  Re: [wsrp-interfaces]
              
                    
                  interactionFieldPrefix
and          
                    
                  namespacing
form params             
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          





Comments in-line in red.

Rich

                    
                     
                     
          
 Michael Freedman                
                     
                   
 <michael.freedman@oracle.com>          
                     
            
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
       To 
 08/31/05 02:11 PM                
          Richard Jacob        
        
                    
                     
  <richard.jacob@de.ibm.com>    
                    
                     
                     
       cc 
                    
                     
  wsrp-interfaces@lists.oasis-o 
                    
                     
  pen.org                
      
                    
                     
                     
  Subject 
                    
                     
  Re: [wsrp-interfaces]         
                    
                     
  interactionFieldPrefix and    
                    
                     
  namespacing form params       
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          





Comments inline in blue.

Richard Jacob wrote:
Hi all, (sorry, lengthy)

I think as the current proposal is in the spec, it is conceptually broken.
I have the following concerns/questions/comments concerning the field and
section 10.4 in the spec:

1. namespacing of form parameters in general