Re: [wsrp-interop] switch to 1.0

[Michael Freedman <Michael.Freedman@oracle.com>]

Its easy for us to upgrade to the 1.0 WSDL.  Its a little more work to 
support the modified URL/namespacing semantics.  Which has more value 
for folks, quickly upgrading to 1.0 WSDL [compatibility] or fully 
upgrading to 1.0 semantics?  In either case as a number of us may be 
preparing WSRP/JSR 168 containers for publication asap once JSR 168 goes 
public we should probably coordinate/agree on a WSRP version for such 
implementations so there is some interoperability when the public gets a 
hold of things.  On the conservative side one would suggest the .95 
versions we have been testing/working with fior the past month.  The 
downside of this is upgrading the public [en mass] once we all switch 
over to 1.0. The risk in going to 1.0 between now and next week is that 
our current interoperability will break.  What do folks think?
     -Mike-

Richard Jacob wrote:

>Since 1.0 is now out, I wanted to raise the question when do people think
>we should switch our interop testing to 1.0?
>Do you have plans to update your implementations to 1.0 soon?
>We (IBM) plan to update as soon as possible, and hope to be able to switch
>our producer to 1.0 maybe end of this week.
>
>Any other opinions, comments, suggestions?
>
>Mit freundlichen Gruessen / best regards,
>
>        Richard Jacob
>______________________________________________________
>IBM Lab Boeblingen, Germany
>Dept.8288, WebSphere Portal Server Development
>Phone: ++49 7031 16-3469  -  Fax: ++49 7031 16-4888
>Email: mailto:richard.jacob@de.ibm.com
>
>
>You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp-interop/members/leave_workgroup.php
>
>  
>