RE: [wsrp-pfb] Groups - wsrp-pfb-uddi-tn-draft-02.doc uploaded

["Richard Jacob" <richard.jacob@de.ibm.com>]

agree, and think we should concentrate for one for ease-of-use and
acceptance.
I will open an issue on this as suggested in my prior mail.

Mit freundlichen Gruessen / best regards,

        Richard Jacob
______________________________________________________
IBM Lab Boeblingen, Germany
Dept.8288, WebSphere Portal Server Development
Phone: ++49 7031 16-3469  -  Fax: ++49 7031 16-4888
Email: mailto:richard.jacob@de.ibm.com


|---------+---------------------------->
|         |           "Kropp, Alan"    |
|         |           <Alan.Kropp@vigne|
|         |           tte.com>         |
|         |                            |
|         |           01/15/2004 07:54 |
|         |           PM               |
|---------+---------------------------->
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                                                                                                  |
  |       To:       "Andre Kramer" <andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com>, Richard Jacob/Germany/IBM@IBMDE, <wsrp-pfb@lists.oasis-open.org>                    |
  |       cc:                                                                                                                                        |
  |       Subject:  RE: [wsrp-pfb] Groups - wsrp-pfb-uddi-tn-draft-02.doc uploaded                                                                   |
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




Are you suggesting the portlet reference the Producer via bindingTemplate
instead of by keyedReference?  Or are you allowing for flexibility of
implementation?

I like the flexibility, but a concern which you also allude to is the
difficulty in normalizing for query purposes.  Shouldn't we settle on one
mechanism?

Alan

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Andre Kramer [mailto:andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com]
      Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 2:39 AM
      To: 'richard.jacob@de.ibm.com'; wsrp-pfb@lists.oasis-open.org
      Subject: RE: [wsrp-pfb] Groups - wsrp-pfb-uddi-tn-draft-02.doc
      uploaded



      I've done a pass over the document and suggested many minor editorial
      changes (see attached). These can be accepted or rejected using the
      change tracking for draft-03.


      My remaining area of concern is on how a Portlet should reference its
      producer.


      I would still like to be able to use HTML registry UI to publish a
      portlet so I added a "Portlet Producer Service Reference"
      *bindingTemplate* (new section 5.3.3). This may be used instead of
      the keyedReference in the businessService category bag entry so that
      the portlet service ends up with two binding infos: one containing
      the portlet handle and another containing the producer's UDDI
      serviceKey.


      I would allow both types of reference (category bag keyedReference or
      bindingTemplate), using the same tModel key. However, it would be
      simpler to only have one mechanims when searching/looking-up.


      Note that, in addition, I would also allow other types of "producer
      reference". E.g. a portlet could add a wsdl link or an inter-registry
      link to its producer and I would keep the tech note open ended on
      this.


      I've updated the test.uddi.microsoft.com "CTXS test" business so that
      the Citrix example portlet now has 3 binding templates of type and
      meaning:


      "WSRP Portlet" - access point contains portlet handle
      "WSRP Producer" - access point is WSDL http url
      "WSRP Producer Service Reference" - access point contains UDDI
      serviceKey for Producer.
      [I've hit the limit on the number of items I can publish into the
      test registry so the service key value is not very sensible and I
      have not tested that the UDDI client SDK can get at all the binding
      info (like categoryBag this should just work, or we raise a bug).]


      I suppose we need to discuss this modified proposal on our next call
      and Richard and I need to fill in some missing parts of doc next.


      regards,
      Andre


      -----Original Message-----
      From: richard.jacob@de.ibm.com [mailto:richard.jacob@de.ibm.com]
      Sent: 18 December 2003 13:24
      To: wsrp-pfb@lists.oasis-open.org
      Subject: [wsrp-pfb] Groups - wsrp-pfb-uddi-tn-draft-02.doc uploaded





      The document revision wsrp-pfb-uddi-tn-draft-02.doc has been
      submitted by Richard Jacob (richard.jacob@de.ibm.com) to the WSRP
      Publish/Find/Bind SC document repository.


      This document is revision #1 of wsrp-pfb-uddi-tn-draft-01.doc.


      Document Description:
      Added Portlet publishing.


      Download Document:
      http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp/wsrp-pfb/download.php/4562/wsrp-pfb-uddi-tn-draft-02.doc



      View Document Details:
      http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp/wsrp-pfb/document.php?document_id=4562



      Revision:
      This document is revision #1 of wsrp-pfb-uddi-tn-draft-01.doc.  The
      document details page referenced above will show the complete
      revision history





      PLEASE NOTE:  If the above links do not work for you, your email
      application
      may be breaking the link into two pieces.  You may be able to copy
      and paste
      the entire link address into the address field of your web browser.






      To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster
      of the OASIS TC), go to
      http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp-pfb/members/leave_workgroup.php
      .