[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [wsrp-wsia] [I#92] Maximum size of a handle
As long as it's SHOULD and not MUST, it is OK, but anyway the 128 number is too small. Our current implementation uses a URL as the "entityHandle" (a la Web philosophy), and URL-s can approach 128. A 1K-4K minimum (SHOULD, not MUST) would be logical to me. Gil -----Original Message----- From: Gil Tayar [mailto:Gil.Tayar@webcollage.com] Sent: Thu, September 19, 2002 08:40 To: wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [wsrp-wsia] [I#92] Maximum size of a handle Topic: interface Class: Minor Technical Title: Maximum size of a handle Document Section: throughout Description: Current draft spec just says that a handle is a string. For reasons of efficient processing, it would be useful to limit the length of the handle to something reasonable. Considering that an entityHandle SHOULD encode the consumerHandle when Consumer side persitence is used and that a refHandle encodes an entityHandle and a sessionHandle, the length should not be too small. Suggestion = 128 characters. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Discussion: ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC