[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [wsrp-wsia] [I#95] destroyEntities() & refHandles
The operation is called destroyEntities, and thus only entityHandles should be passed. A refHandle is not an entityHandle (although the inverse is true!), thus cannot be passed, and thus the question is meaningless (although because of the "inheritance" a comment should be added to the spec). It's like asking what happens when a navigationalState is passed to destroyEntities. On the semantics of destroying entities with sessions on them, I would say that this is illegal, and that the Producer CAN check for this and return a specific fault -----Original Message----- From: Gil Tayar [mailto:Gil.Tayar@webcollage.com] Sent: Thu, September 19, 2002 08:53 To: wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [wsrp-wsia] [I#95] destroyEntities() & refHandles Topic: interface Class: Technical Title: destroyEntities() & refHandles Document Section: 5.2 Description: At the F2F we separated releasedHandles() into 2 operations, one of which is destroyEntities(). We also began the exploration of what the signatures would look like with a unified refHandle that encode both entityHandle and sessionID. What semantics do we want to define for a refHandle being passed to destroyEntities()? What are the semantics for destroying entities that have active sessions on them? %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Discussion: ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC