OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsrp-wsia message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Subject: RE: [wsrp-wsia] [I#95] destroyEntities() & refHandles

The operation is called destroyEntities, and thus only entityHandles should
be passed. A refHandle is not an entityHandle (although the inverse is
true!), thus cannot be passed, and thus the question is meaningless
(although because of the "inheritance" a comment should be added to the
spec). It's like asking what happens when a navigationalState is passed to

On the semantics of destroying entities with sessions on them, I would say
that this is illegal, and that the Producer CAN check for this and return a
specific fault

-----Original Message-----
From: Gil Tayar [mailto:Gil.Tayar@webcollage.com]
Sent: Thu, September 19, 2002 08:53
To: wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsrp-wsia] [I#95] destroyEntities() & refHandles

Topic:  interface
Class:  Technical
Title:  destroyEntities() & refHandles
Document Section: 5.2
At the F2F we separated releasedHandles() into 2 operations, one of which
is destroyEntities(). We also began the exploration of what the signatures
would look like with a unified refHandle that encode both entityHandle and
sessionID. What semantics do we want to define for a refHandle being passed
to destroyEntities()? What are the semantics for destroying entities that
have active sessions on them?


To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Powered by eList eXpress LLC